Meredith Ashton
Reading Response
The Omnivore’s Dilemma
7 November 2016
The Vegetarian’s
Dilemma
“This is
what can happened when…you look. And what you see when you look is the
cruelty—and the blindness to cruelty—required to produce eggs that can be sold
for seventy-nine cents a dozen,” writes Michael Pollan (318). The third section
of The Omnivore’s Dilemma delves into
the controversial subject of the ethics behind eating animals. After extensive
research and contemplation, Pollen decides that the decision to eat meat should
be left up to the individual. However, in order to make an informed decision
one must be fully conscious of the process behind the raising and eventual
slaughter of one’s meal; a process that has been thoroughly obscured by the
long chain of events from cow to hamburger in the industrial food system.
My mother reached a similar conclusion to Pollan during her
college days. Unfortunately for her, however, Polyface Farms was not a road
trip away. Thus her (and my) adventure of vegetarianism was born. I’ve abstained
from meat for my entire life—it’s all I’ve ever known. Aside from the chicken
McNugget I tried on a road trip with a friend’s family, the occasional hotdog I
consumed as a child because my dad insisted that “it’s not real meat anyways,”
and a dry bite of turkey one Thanksgiving, meat has never been a mainstay of my
diet. Curiously, the smell of cooking meat is still delicious to me, but it
makes me crave my own, veggie-friendly foods.
It’s interesting to me that I claim these vegetarian foods
as “my own.” More accurately, of course, they belong to myself, the 7.3 million
other vegetarians in the US, and really the rest of the human population on
earth. Regardless, I still take pride in my diet. Growing up I was always the
girl with the “weird” lunch. Instead of the ham & cheese sandwich on white
I had avocado and black beans on whole-grain wheat. It was difficult to find a
fast food joint where I could eat something other than French fries (which wasn’t
too much of an issue in my eight-year-old mind), and staying for dinner at
friend’s houses always required special accommodations so that “Meredith could
have something to eat.” I can empathize with Pollan when he writes, “what
troubles me most about my vegetarianism is the subtle way it alienates me from
other people and, as odd as this might sound, from a whole dimension of human
experience,” (314).
Over the years, however, I have come to view my diet as a
point of connection, rather than one of disconnect. When I left my home for
college, I was faced with a choice I had never before encountered: to eat meat
or not to eat meat. My entire life I had justified my diet with the simple fact
that “it’s the food my mom cooks.” Now cafeteria workers were happily grilling
up burgers and pork and meat balls and meats I couldn’t even identify,
displayed in gleaming metal containers for carnivorous college students.
At first I simply had no interest in trying the meat (and
honestly I questioned the integrity of the cafeteria’s meat standards). Then, I
started my own journey towards vegetarianism that followed Pollan’s in a
pattern of research, discovery, and personal contemplation. In my first year
seminar, I learned about food ways and sustainable eating and read The Omnivore’s Dilemma cover to cover. I
realized that my vegetarian diet connected me not only to my mom’s cooking but
also to the earth around me. I liked knowing from where my food was coming,
without the possibility of the industrial meat industry’s interference. My
journey of “looking” at my dietary decisions, ironically, ended where it began, with my
continued choice to pursue a plant-based diet. Now, however, it was my choice.
My food. My own manner of conscious consumption.
If you knew exactly where your meat was coming from, and that the animals were raised and killed humanely (if humane killing isn't an oxymoron) would you include it in your diet? If not, does that add a different element to your reasons for vegetarianism?
ReplyDelete